

Which is why I’ve dropped it myself. Not worth the price.


Which is why I’ve dropped it myself. Not worth the price.
I once discovered that the waffle house jukebox is accessible online. Me and some friends were drinking and played all star for 4 hours straight. Someone tried at one point to insert other songs, but there was an option to give your song priority.
The jukebox went dead around 3am.
Ironically under Biden yes they would be affected. Under Trump, well i won’t say they won’t be affected, but they won’t be drafted
There was a time not too long ago that this action alone would have ended his presidency.
Our society has really deteriorated


You said you only cared about innocent lives while disregarding these lives. You said that not me.
Going to ignore your weird comment


Why do you assume that’s not what I want?
I just didn’t see that option on the ballot
Harm reduction the day we get to the ballot, rest of the days to changing the system. I’d rather face shitty choices that move us 1 step back or keeps the status quo than to allow a madman the reigns. Things were shit before, they are worse now. It may take a decade to even get back to where we were let alone progress.
This is assuming non-violent options of course


Oh so the people murdered by ICE were guilty or at the very least not innocent in your eyes?


I don’t give a shit if you think I’m acting irrationally or that I’m a bad person. I know that I’m not.
Wow we’ve just moved on to full MAGA logic with that one.
You know the funniest thing is you assume we’re on different sides. We’re likely not. I acted on harm reduction. I want less dead people, but apparently you want more:
Give me what I want (ending the mass slaughter of innocents) or we all go down together.


Ah yeah that totally is a logical approach to what was said.
MAGA level logic


And this is our fundamental disagreement. No action I could take would have stopped the US’s support of the genocide.
However there was 1 action that I chose to take that could have prevented those murders. You chose in-action resulting in more deaths


I’ll take egg on my face over blood on my hands.
Here the a list of those you helped ice murder
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/jan/04/ice-2025-deaths-timeline


Obviously we will
Damn you people are dense. It’s not like the sitting president has been talking about canceling elections…oh wait
All you voting objectors did was lead to more dead minorities. The people Trump’s new Reich is targeting. We have a fascist military in our streets killing people and all you can do is still whine about how Kamala was flawed.


Yes, he took the action of sending them even more weapons than what congress had appropriated.
Thank goodness Trump stopped that, oh wait
Also you ever notice that people barely talk about the genocide anymore?
We know there’s no way to change Trump’s opinion on Palestine, and now we are fully focused on stopping him from starting new wars or sending ICE around the country to murder dissenters. Those that cared now have to focus on pressing domestic issues. If Kamala was president we’d still be focused on ending the genocide and there was at least a chance there would have been an end or progress, but now the current trajectory is the genocide will not be stopped and we’ll probably not have elections again


I’d argue a worse genocide.
Dems were stuck on “but but Israel is an ally” and tried to gently suggest that they stop. But Biden did take some action. The US even built a port to send in aid. Now obviously we had the power to stop sending Israel money and supporting them. That’s where they failed.
Trump however just said good work and keep it up. He’s encouraged Israel to go faster and joked about how great the strip will be once it’s freely developed real estate.
So yeah, one of these is clearly a worse option
You are correct but no need to say “modern man”. Biologically we are the same as those humans. We would just need to adjust to the new diet. Our bodies can still handle their lifestyle
Don’t worry, there’s no way that the US wouldn’t make it Europe’s problem if he started invading other nations.
He could only invade Mexico or South America ( without triggering article 5. Since Canada and Greenland (through Denmark) are both NATO members if he messes with them then its immediately a good chunk of Europe’s problem. There’s also French Guiana in Soth America and some islands in the carribean I forgot when I started typing that would also trigger article 5.