REDACTED@infosec.pub to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agoNope, not visiting thatinfosec.pubimagemessage-square149linkfedilinkarrow-up1594arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1573arrow-down1imageNope, not visiting thatinfosec.pubREDACTED@infosec.pub to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square149linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCanaconda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·4 months agoDoesn’t justify you walking around calling people ableist for not knowing that bub. Grow the fuck up.
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoThat’s generally how people find out. Until then, it is both at the same time. Schroedinger’s douchebag and all.
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoIs this an appropriate place to bring up that Schrödinger was (also, and kind of openly) a paedo?
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoI mean, sure. He plausibly would’ve been in the Epstein files had be lived in the right era. He would’ve fit right in.
Doesn’t justify you walking around calling people ableist for not knowing that bub. Grow the fuck up.
That’s generally how people find out. Until then, it is both at the same time. Schroedinger’s douchebag and all.
Is this an appropriate place to bring up that Schrödinger was (also, and kind of openly) a paedo?
I mean, sure. He plausibly would’ve been in the Epstein files had be lived in the right era. He would’ve fit right in.