I don’t think the problem is inherently that AI is coming about. I think the problem is that the rich and powerful are racing to AI when we don’t have a social safety-net to handle the mass unemployment this will cause. AI would be fine (mostly) if people weren’t also at risk of losing their homes, food, and healthcare because of it. We are racing to replace human thought and production, but not ensuring people will be able to still eat.

  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I saw him speak last week. He touched briefly on the subject, and he wasn’t wholly opposed to AI, just wanted to regulate it. He saw the value in what it was going to do for medicine.

    And I wholeheartedly agree. Right now AI is in the hands of a few select companies run mostly by billionaires. AI should be a public good, like libraries. Doubly so for the ones that trained on public or unauthorized data.

    I like AI, it helps me do my job, helps me with some hobbies, and it helped me with tax decisions the other day. But, laws need to be passed to steer AI for public benefit. I’m glad Bernie is thinking about it that way. I just wish the rest of our politicians would keep up, because this thing is moving fast and we need to be more proactive. Being reactive is going to be much more challenging to keep up.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always say this in these threads: AI was trained on all human thought so it should belong to all humans.