Federated, open‑source, ad‑free, and fully under your control. Build or join a community that reflects your values with no corporate overlords.
This instance is run by the founder of PieFed.
[Mobile apps for PieFed](https://piefed.social/post/1258559)
Cable crunch is a massive improvement from planks. You get a good stretch, there’s more than zero range of motion, and you can adjust weight for progressive overload.
Roman chair knee or leg raises are good too. Russian twist or cable twist for obliques.
Planks have no range of motion, no stretch, no progressive overload. It is an absolutely shit exercise IMO.
Well, range of motion and stretch aren’t really valid criticisms for plank IMO. It’s intended to train your core to resist extension forces and train proper neutral posture under load in your lower back. Cable crunch doesn’t do that, and in the context of lower back pain, crunches could be detrimental. With the plank, there is progressive overload, if you do more than one set and you progress the exercise. This might look like an appeal to authority, but the trainers and physiotherapists I learned from state that.
You’re free to believe it’s a shit exercise, but I have personally benefited from it, and so have my clients.
Range of motion and stretch are key to building muscle. Core muscles are no different than any other muscle. You wouldn’t build chest or quads effectively by holding an isometric lift, why apply this to abs?
Beyond absolute noobs who can’t hold a plank for 1-2 minutes, I feel it’s a bad exercise. Once you can hold it for 2 mins there’s no point. It’s a ton of effort and you get a good burn, but you’re not going to build muscle or strength for the aforementioned reasons.
Of course, do whatever works for you. For me? Absolute shit tier exercise, almost anything else is an improvement. Perhaps we’re talking about different goals here, though.
I’m 6’3”, in my 40s, and no lower back pain despite being on the computer most of my life, so I feel I’m doing something right with regards to back health.
Cable crunch is a massive improvement from planks. You get a good stretch, there’s more than zero range of motion, and you can adjust weight for progressive overload.
Roman chair knee or leg raises are good too. Russian twist or cable twist for obliques.
Planks have no range of motion, no stretch, no progressive overload. It is an absolutely shit exercise IMO.
Well, range of motion and stretch aren’t really valid criticisms for plank IMO. It’s intended to train your core to resist extension forces and train proper neutral posture under load in your lower back. Cable crunch doesn’t do that, and in the context of lower back pain, crunches could be detrimental. With the plank, there is progressive overload, if you do more than one set and you progress the exercise. This might look like an appeal to authority, but the trainers and physiotherapists I learned from state that.
You’re free to believe it’s a shit exercise, but I have personally benefited from it, and so have my clients.
You have responded so respectfully. Appreciate your well drafted messages.
Range of motion and stretch are key to building muscle. Core muscles are no different than any other muscle. You wouldn’t build chest or quads effectively by holding an isometric lift, why apply this to abs?
Beyond absolute noobs who can’t hold a plank for 1-2 minutes, I feel it’s a bad exercise. Once you can hold it for 2 mins there’s no point. It’s a ton of effort and you get a good burn, but you’re not going to build muscle or strength for the aforementioned reasons.
Of course, do whatever works for you. For me? Absolute shit tier exercise, almost anything else is an improvement. Perhaps we’re talking about different goals here, though.
I’m 6’3”, in my 40s, and no lower back pain despite being on the computer most of my life, so I feel I’m doing something right with regards to back health.