• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      26 days ago

      Ah, yes, solar roadways: because everybody knows the best thing to do with your (relatively, compared to asphalt or concrete) expensive and fragile electronics is to drive cars on them! And the best place for a flat panel that provides shade and rain protection is underfoot, not overhead.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        25 days ago

        It’s actually quite fascinating that some people think it’s a good idea. It’s so bad in so many ways it’s kind of impressive.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          They don’t provide shade when they’re embedded in the roadway!

          What you want is just a solar panel canopy over the roadway, which is a different thing.

    • Starfighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      26 days ago

      Sorry to ruin your day but solar frickin roadways is currently doing another funding round.

      And for some unexplainable reason people are still giving them more money.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s just such a stupid idea on the face of it. Let’s get rid of the extremely durable and infinitely recyclable road surface and replace it with a fragile and unrecyclable chunk of plastic and electronics. Let’s put a million tiny solar panels in these chunks of plastic that’ll get demolished by cars instead of putting a few larger, cheaper solar panels at the side of the road