I understand that money needs to continually be printed as bills and coins are damaged or lost, but wouldn’t any currency be way more stable if it was just printed slower than it’s taken out of circulation?

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          21 days ago

          That’s basically what it has always been once it moved away from the inherent value of the coins. Banks have always been promises, that’s why things like the FDIC were necessary.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            Even coins themselves have no inherent value. That’s why they are used as coins, they aren’t useful for anything else.

            Before electricity became popular, pennies were made of copper. After electricity made copper inherently valuable, people started melting down pennies and using the copper for an actually valuable purpose.

            Even gold has little inherent value. That’s why people buy it just to let it sit on a shelf doing nothing. There isn’t anything more practically valuable they could do with it.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Yeah, banks are required to keep x% I forget in reserves and they loan the rest out. Do the Taylor series and that’s our money supply