• kurwa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is being baked in because of US law. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US made some federal laws requiring your religion in the near future.

    There’s a big difference between data collection and government mandated identification.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is being baked in because of US law. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US made some federal laws requiring your religion in the near future.

      And that is why it is a slippery slope fallacy. Eventually, superpowers are going to want to have access to your machines (they already do, but mostly in isolated cases). So any kind of data storage and overrides should be destroyed. So let’s go shred our hard drives and remove the concept of sudo/root access?


      Also, I will just add on that it is more than just the US that is increasingly pushing for age verification.

      • kurwa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        People can run secure systems that share minimal info. This requires all systems to store and share specific info. So you’re making it illegal to have a private system. Sure most people don’t, but now you’re making it illegal. You think that’s okay because we don’t have good privacy laws right now? You want to give up?

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          People can run secure systems that share minimal info.

          And those generally aren’t the machines you want to connect to the internet and use for all your everyday browsing.

          This requires all systems to store and share specific info.

          Specific, unverified, info. That you are already sharing in most of the situations where it is being asked for.

          So you’re making it illegal to have a private system. Sure most people don’t, but now you’re making it illegal.

          A lot of things are illegal. Without the third party verification requirement, you are perfectly fine to hardcode that to say you were born on June 9th, 1969 by default. And that complies with the California legislation (last I read through it).

          You think that’s okay because we don’t have good privacy laws right now? You want to give up?

          No. I want people to actually understand what is going on so that they can actually protect themselves.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              That is really going to depend on what your actual risk is. There are a decent number of articles and videos out there that go into what journalists have to do and… they are generally ahead of the curve on stuff like that.

              But what people SHOULD do is to gain an understanding of what is actually going on. This entire debacle REALLY feels like a mix of people being mislead as to what the California legislature actually is (whether for Views or more nefarious reasons) combined with making it abundantly clear that they know absolutely nothing about their current risks.

              Like, you telling pornhub you are over 18 is not telling PornhubCorp anything they don’t already know from all the other cookies and fingerprints you are carrying everywhere. Hell, a lot of services are dedicated to tracking by IP to get around incognito mode and even caching to get around VPNs (although, most don’t have to bother since people have been trained to just put EVERYTHING through a vpn so that it doesn’t matter in the first place). They are literally just ticking a checkbox in the hope of not getting blocked by more payment processors.

              So if you truly care about protecting your age? Have multiple devices. Learn how to split your traffic based upon device to get around many fingerprinting techniques. Figure out where to sit at Starbucks so that you have your back to a wall but don’t look like a pervert. And so forth.

              Rather than freaking out and throwing tantrums because people are trying to inform you about how little a self-reported age at the OS level that can be requested matters.


              One fun bit of paranoia. I am sure most people are aware of the “Abnormal behavior has been detected from your IP. Please click here and then do some ML training to prove you are human” prompts that tend to come up on shared connections or if you have too many adblockers running.

              Understand a lot of that is you “consenting” to have even more of your specific cookies checked (which is what happens when they “verify” you without a test). But a few years back there was an excellent paper that actually used how you perform on the ML training to further fingerprint you. The person at 1.2.3.4 with these cookies who is probably color blind is distinguished from the person at 1.2.3.4 with most of the same cookies (everyone loves going to Dildos R Us) but gets confused over whether a hotel shuttle is a bus.

              And that all goes towards making sure they know exactly who you are and what ads (and trackers) to use.