Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square288linkfedilinkarrow-up1687arrow-down133
arrow-up1654arrow-down1external-linkLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square288linkfedilink
minus-squareAlex@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoNo, that’s why the author asserts that with their signed-of-by. It’s what I do if I use any LLM content as the basis of my patches.
minus-squareell1e@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 days agoSo what does the signed-off-by magically solve here, that doesn’t require either you or the contributor to legally review every line by an LLM? If you’re not a lawyer, is your contributor going to be one?
No, that’s why the author asserts that with their signed-of-by. It’s what I do if I use any LLM content as the basis of my patches.
So what does the signed-off-by magically solve here, that doesn’t require either you or the contributor to legally review every line by an LLM? If you’re not a lawyer, is your contributor going to be one?