• PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe it is finally time for open-source(ish) dating to make an impact!

    (It won’t. I tried it a couple years back and it is a ghost town!)

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s probably a Goldilocks zone thing where too few prevents it from working, and too many will inevitably be overrun by bots and scanners.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hey, you! Yea, you reading this.

    This scan won’t work on you. The app will get lost in your eyes. 😏

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      If it’s anything like whatever eyeball tech my local DMV was using last time I had to go in for a new license, it won’t work because I have to forcibly open my eyes so ludicrously far, like Gowron on meth, that I would never put that on their app.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Oh, people didn’t like the idea of giving their ID to third parties? Let’s move up to irreplaceable body parts. Next step: your fucking blood. Good luck declaring that one stolen when the database inevitably leaks.

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      That reminds me of my ex, she was willing to give her physical address and phone number to anyone who asked, but not her email address, because of security concerns.

  • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Oh I just watched a video on this the other day, apparently scammers (like the types who do romance scams, pretending to be a gorgeous guy, then taking all your money) are getting around this security function.

    They upload all stolen pics of a gorgeous guy (probably exists for women versions too) then there’s one picture of them, because they have to have one pic of themselves to get the verification tick. But that one pic is obscured, like a face on a billboard or add on a poster on a street. And then tinder verifies the whole account, regardless of the other pics. I forget, it’s either bumble or hinge, I think it was bumble, deletes all the pics that don’t look like you, after verification, so those were sites that block that scam.

    That’s an aside from ai profiles. There does need to be something to protect users from scammers. I couldn’t ever speak for what the best verification option is, myself.

  • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Haven’t used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won’t be using it in the future. I’m not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

  • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

    🤮

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Could be unique like a fingerprint. Might be able to crosscheck this with other biometric data, like when a picture is taken at airports or border crossings.

      • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s this - all of the sensational takes get the updoots though - it’s them getting you actual unique identifier

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Those fast track lines at the airport I recently read somewhere is supplied by a private entity, which means all those face scans are just added into a database for future surveillance.

        • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You can say no to the face scan at those. The TSA agents don’t get paid enough to try to convince you otherwise and just say “okay.” The amount of people just willingly scanning their faces for whatever nefarious bullshit they want to scan faces for does not surprise me, but does cause me dismay