• CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    it’s literally how it works

    That’s all I’m saying.

    And yes we were all misled that is the point many people are making in this thread.

    please design an experiment that proves the outcome is determined precisely when the detector detects the particle going through the slit, and not when a person observes the recording the detector made

    Why double down you were misled and misunderstood but now you know better, that to obersve something you need to interact with it therefore changing the state it is in. The first panel is also wrong it is being observed, after the light passes the slits.

    • Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A reply to your edit: You need to work on your grammar, spelling, and punctuation. I can’t understand a thing you’re saying.

      I’m KFC Double Downing on the double slits being doubly doubtful until you’ve observed the result.

      • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah so you lack reading comprehension that explains a lot… the youtube channel qualifications. Anyways dude I didn’t mean to insult your intellectual indentity. If my comment came accross as harsh it is because I’m annoyed at communicators.

        • Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I mentioned my sources of science news specifically because you accused me of being misled by… somebody. So fuck off with your mockery of me for trying to disuade you of that notion.

          This started as a joke, and you’re just being an ass.