KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoBrowsers Treat Big Sites Differentlydenodell.comexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down14
arrow-up1160arrow-down1external-linkBrowsers Treat Big Sites Differentlydenodell.comKatherinaReichelt@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoA standard is that, a standard. The amount of moving parts (features?) is irrelevant. Either it’s up to the standard or it isn’t.
minus-squaregroet@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoThen no browser will be “up to” the last 15 years of the standard as none implement all features.
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoCorrect. That is why we’re talking about having standards and enforcing them. That’s the whole point.
minus-squaregroet@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNo the point of this discussion is about having one single yes/no question about the standard or a list of features.
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoSo, we’re speaking different languages. Got it.
A standard is that, a standard. The amount of moving parts (features?) is irrelevant.
Either it’s up to the standard or it isn’t.
Then no browser will be “up to” the last 15 years of the standard as none implement all features.
Correct. That is why we’re talking about having standards and enforcing them. That’s the whole point.
No the point of this discussion is about having one single yes/no question about the standard or a list of features.
So, we’re speaking different languages. Got it.