• king_comrade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it were a man fucking 1000 girls in a day, we’d all celebrate. What’s more unattractive than a high body count? Insecurity.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If it were a man fucking 1000 girls in a day, we’d all celebrate.

      This statement makes me doubt that you know any actual human people irl.

      • king_comrade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        How are all of you so blind to not see the obvious double standard. Many men have been celebrated for their promiscuity and even their sinister actions. Trump is one of these men and managed to win the US election twice. It’s worth celebrating Bonnie blue for at least doing it for the hustle.

    • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, did you get your idea of gender roles from reading feminist books in the 90’s while never having actually set foot on earth’s surface from your flying saucer? A lot of men and women would have various kinds of issues if you were a man who fucked 1000 women in one day you fucking space alien.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          tell that to all the women in my life i’ve dated who think i’m a filthy slut for sleeping with more than a handful of women.

          and who had more partners than me. almost as if the double-standard is the person’s projected shame.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        wow, wow, buddy. this is the internet.

        we can’t have reasonable and common sense takes here. JUST GENDER RAGE.

        should report you for HATE speech, with all this reasonable commentary you have here.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      All? Nah, I’d be wearing PPE and calling a health department to give people STD tests and see if a super spreader event just happened, regardless of sex, gender, or orientation.

      No way the condoms are having a 100% success rate at the number in a single 24 hours.

      • king_comrade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yep that’s right, orgies and sex parties are notorious for diseases. There’s no way the exact opposite is true and you’re a lazy bigot who couldn’t be more clever insulting pro sex communities. Crack another joke jester, but maybe try this time yeh?

        • Lumisal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yep that’s right, orgies and sex parties are notorious for diseases.

          I mean, yeah?

          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4714774/ (Increased levels of Gonorrhea in certain models of MSM)

          https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-021-05813-5 (Increased odds of STIs in cis/bi swingers)

          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3410442/ (Higher odds of transmission in an orgy, and that’s just based on self reporting - actual transmission numbers are higher)

          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100623212635.htm (Much higher increased rates of STIs among elderly swinger/group sex communities)

          These are just some statistics proving that, even though basic damn logic and math would normally lead a person of basic levels of intelligence to conclude that the logistics of such events would increase the odds of STIs spreading; much like a person with the flu sneezing in a plane, even with a mask, is more likely to infect others than 2 people in an open field - but I understand providing empirical data is important still.

          Note that none of these events involved anywhere close to a 1001 people in a single day. Which means the odds would be much higher with that many people in involved, as screening that many people fully would be both expensive and more difficult to do in an organized manner, and the odds of a condom slip or other protective measure failing would only go up.

          But by all means, do keep talking and showing everyone your magnificent grasp on basic statistical logic.