• redshift@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Would you mind sharing the revelation? I’m not sure yet what’s infuriating. The files are sorted by year primarily; the only tie is 1950, and “I” (in “XIX”) comes before “V” (in “XVIII”) alphabetically, so they’re in order as well.

      • redshift@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        19 and 18 are out of order, but computers don’t sort Roman numerals numerically unless you make them. They’re sorted correctly alphabetically.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          But that is what they are talking about. The Roman numbers are out of order. That’s why it’s mildly infuriating. It’s not that what’s happening doesn’t make sense.

        • IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Computers sort by characters in order. In English order, I comes before either X or Y. So the fact that these characters are out of order, while on a computer that orders things numerically->alphabetically, means that every part of this image is out of order, by definition of its medium.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The files are sorted by the numeric year first, up to 1950.

            The two files for 1950 are together, as they should be.

            But the letters are sorted alphabetically, so XI comes before XV. It doesn’t see that they are numbers, it’s reading them as letters.

            If they want it sorted correctly, they should rename the files:

            “1950 - 018
            1950 - 019”

            That would work. Interestingly enough, so would:

            “1950 - Eighteen
            1950 - Nineteen”