The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    From OPs linked article…

    In tests involving 197 participants, the researchers said the system identified individuals with nearly 100% accuracy. The recognition remained effective regardless of viewing angle or how the participants walked.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can totally believe when it tracks a person it can tell when the same person walks by again later. But matching people with their actual identities would require a database of wifi scan data that simply doesn’t exist yet.

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well in theory every tech possibility is a “yet”, but the way I read this it seems like a person or object’s interference pattern is particular to the local signal environment - not like a fingerprint a different system could recognize at the airport.