Seems like he’s been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.

  • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    How do you know those were the result of the AI?

    I quite deliberately tried to err on the side of fixing security issues for that release, and there were some valid (but unusual) use cases that got caught up in the changes.

    Seems to me like it was just his own fault. AI may very well have had nothing to do with the regressions, other than maybe not identifying them?

      • fruitcantfly@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Those people are wrong. The 3.4.3 release passes all the integration tests in the 3.4.1 release’s test-suite, which is the last release without LLM code. You can easily test this yourself

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      If the generator made a mistake, it’s actually not its fault, and you can’t prove it. If the code works, it’s an amazing achievement of the machine, singularity is here, you don’t need to look any further.