I personally feel that goes against what this community should be about but I’d like feedback, especially on wording.
I don’t feel generative “ai” audio is fitting here but a eurorack/modular/generative sequencer type thing would be welcome.
Given a recent post I believe the general community agrees but I need help with wording.
Any thoughts are appreciated.
Edit: not the focus, but I do think stem splitting models are fine, but I would interested in discussion about that too.
I’m not sure who he is or what he uses, so I can’t say.
I don’t oppose machine learning. It’s a tool, and it’s quite handy for things. For example, I make ample use of RNNoise If you were to say, record a bunch of samples from an instrument and train a model on that, I don’t really see the problem with that.
My problem lies more in the underhanded tactics big corporations are doing right now, stealing masses of data, meddling hard in politics, destroying communities, etc. all for what’s ultimately a rather underwhelming and extremely expensive end product no one even asked for.
You really should look him up. There’s a good chance he’s had a hand in, work that touched you, or at least inspired it. He pioneered ambient music for example.