• flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Arch usually doesn’t re-package Python packages that aren’t needed for something else, meaning they end up in the AUR. I maintain several there, and when I stop using them I abandon them. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the ones I used to maintain are on the list

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, Python has been a massive vulnerability for a long while. And the AUR has similar issues. This is only getting widespread coverage now. But it’s always been a risk.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, we need a kind of Debian for Python.

        Part of the solution could be the Guix package manager. Part could be the commercial offerings, like Anaconda.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, those are mostly extension libraries, stuff “normally” installed using pip. Arch is kind of unique that they encourage using system aur over pip, npm and other package managers. While it is a big radius, none of the python packages stick out to me, but maybe I just haven’t encountered the popular ones.

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The attackers specifically targeted orphaned projects on AUR so it’s no wonder most of those aren’t familiar to us.

      • esc@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It isn’t really all that unique? Debian does it, el does it, probably almost any popular distro?