Why is the New York Times glorifying the career of lifelong charlatan Uri Geller?

friendlyatheist.substack.com

-1

Why is the New York Times glorifying the career of lifelong charlatan Uri Geller?

friendlyatheist.substack.com

Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to

Skeptic@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years ago

The puff piece downplays the lies Geller has told over the past several decades

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Skeptic@lemmy.world

skeptic@lemmy.world

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !skeptic@lemmy.world

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Civility
Thoughtful discussion based on evidence and facts
Humor

Things we don’t like:

Personal attacks or disrespectful attitude
Wild speculation on events with no evidence
Low-effort comments and posts

Other communities of interest:

Fediverse vs Disinformation

“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” -David Hume

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
1 user / week
1 user / month
31 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
1.71K subscribers
21 Posts
1 Comment
Modlog