• Noobnarski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Agriculture is already somewhat unnatural, so I guess a “natural” life would be hunter gatherers.

      • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Somewhat yes, nature usually tries to adapt to the environment, we are adapting the environment to us.

        I haven’t seen any other animal building roads and factories and cities.

      • silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Buddy, what is natural about me, a person who has never met you, talking to you, a person I have never met. How the hell doss that make any sense. Fuckin’ superpowers m8. All up in this gadget.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      oh I see, so if you aren’t a roving band of stone age people, then it’s unnatural?

      and are these societies also matriarchal or something too, because you know the patriarchy is unnatural as well?

      • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Kind of, humans were hunter gatherers for so long that we evolved to be good at it, so I guess that’s what would be natural for us.

        Agriculture and our current life hasn’t been around long enough for us to properly adapt to it.

        I have no idea if those societies were patriarchal or matriarchal, I would imagine both happened or maybe even some sort of equality, if you want to know more about this go ask an expert in the field.

        But in the end I don’t care what you do, I just continued your argument.