A woman drives with both hands on the wheel. Her phone sits face-down on her lap. No officer pulls her over. No lights flash. Weeks later, a $1,251 ticket arrives in the mail. The evidence: a single frame from a Camera surveillance app. The charge: phone use while driving.

Automated camera companies market their devices as automated license plate readers — tools for catching stolen cars, flagging warrants, and aiding serious investigations.

Sold as a Crime Tool. Used as a Fine Machine.

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Why is it illegal to have a phone in your lap? That doesn’t make sense. That’s bizarre.

    Edit:

    Really? This is a hot take? WTF!

    • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I know in Western Australia, where I live, it is illegal to have the phone resting on any part of your body.

      https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/road-safety-commission/mobile-phones-and-distractions

      I wonder where the line is drawn between on your lap vs in your pocket. By that I mean, what if it is in a clear pouch on a lanyard around your neck, or in a running-armband. In both those cases it could still be used by need not have been touched while the car is driving.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      The only reason to have a phone in your lap while driving is if you intend to use said phone while driving.

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        That logic can be applied to anywhere in the car that the driver can reach. Is the Australian government suffering a collective stroke? Should we send help?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you write enough laws in a manner that makes it easy to violate them accidentally, then anyone can be prosecuted at any time and civil liberties can be removed via technicalities.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      A law that specified you were actively using the phone would be hard to enforce. Simmiliar to how it is usually illegal to have open alcohol within reach of the driver. The officer doesn’t have to actually see you drinking it.

          • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            These are cargo cult laws. They don’t understand what the original laws were about. They just know “use phone in car bad” but they don’t know why. Used to you had to hold the phone to your head and block half of your vision.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes it does. Your phone is in your lap so you can look at it. Keep it away. I know everyone is addicted to them but just drive without looking st it.

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t own a car. I ride a bicycle and take Ubers and Lyfts for long distance travel, and smart phones are like the spice mélange to those drivers. They seem to need them to navigate the Universe. So this law just seems terribly ill-conceived. The lap is just an oddly specific place to focus on. So you can set them on the dashboard, center console, or anywhere else, but the lap is the danger zone?

        My main phone is a dumb phone. I hate smart phones and only got one specifically for Ubder and Lyfts, so I’m not addicted. So I’m standing outside looking in and it’s a bizarre law. Sure, we don’t want people playing Angry Birds while driving, but I don’t think this is a well thought out solution that does anything at all except cause more chaos and suffering.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you slam on the brakes or maybe brake too sudden and it flies off and onto the floor, then it could potentially slide under a pedal (like the brakes), hindering its function.

      Is it likely? Probably not, but it is a dangerous hazard waiting to happen.

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve been trying to wrap my mind around the logic of this law and this was one of the things I considered they must be worried about. It’s not so much people using them, it’s just they don’t want them in the lap. Because Uber and Lyft drivers have to use them for work in the US. Here they have they often have a mount on the dash board to hold their phone and they’re constantly taking calls and checking maps.

        As you say though it’s like a one in a million event freak accident if it flies off the lap and gets stuck under the pedal. It would be weird to pass a law for some off the wall scenario like that.