A letter calls for policymakers to do more to understand and respond to potential disruptions from artificial intelligence.

    • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not the paper here so much as the signers that are the problem (though the NYT is more than happy to platform the worst people)

      • nymnympseudonym@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You have an axe to grind, more like a religious tenet than an honest fact-based opinion.

        Tell me, of the 16 Nobel laureates in Economics the list, who got their prizes over the last 20 years, on issues from the effects of institutions to markets, policy, dynamics, development economics, and behavioral dynamics … which exactly are the “worst people”, and why, specifically?

        EDIT: make your job easier, here are their names. The scoundrels!

        Daron Acemoglu

        Simon Johnson

        James A. Robinson

        Joseph E. Stiglitz

        A. Michael Spence

        Eric S. Maskin

        Roger B. Myerson

        Paul R. Milgrom

        Robert B. Wilson

        Robert J. Shiller

        Christopher A. Pissarides

        Peter A. Diamond

        Dale T. Mortensen

        Abhijit Banerjee

        Esther Duflo

        Michael Kremer

        • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Just to be clear: you think it’s the AI skeptics whose views are faith-like, and you give me an appeal to authority to back that up?

          • nymnympseudonym@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Your OG contribution:

            Stop repeating corpo criti-hype

            I pointed out that I am posting a short simple statement backed up by hundreds of impressive people, including over a dozen Nobel Laureates.

            Your response:

            the signers that are the problem (though the NYT is more than happy to platform the worst people)

            So I listed their names and asked for how, specifically, these are the “worst people”.

            How do you come to that conclusion? Is it by virtue of the fact that they have Nobel prizes? Or because they signed the statement? If the latter, which, at least, of the 3 points do you disagree with, and why?

            Are you this reflexively contrarian with everyone, or just me personally? Just curious

            • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              There is no Nobel prize in economics; the award you’re referring to was created long after Nobel’s death and has been “awarded” to many reactionaries including Milton Friedman. If someone criticized the idea that the social responsibility of corporations is to maximize profit and someone else responded by pointing to Friedman’s fake award, it would have about as much merit.