• undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    And while we’re at it let’s just push even more shit above the earth because there’s totally not already a whole bunch of stuff up there.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, technically there really isn’t much up there now.

      I mean in low earth orbit it’s what, 99.999999999999999999999 % empty space? With the tiny fraction left being satellites.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        By that logic you wouldn’t mind if I loosed a bag of mosquitos in your house, would you?

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well let’s run with that. If you put a single mosquito in my house, I would have a higher ratio of mosquito to air than low earth orbit currently has in its ratio of satellites to empty space. (Seriously)

          • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s easy to remove any number of mosquitos from your house, 1 person and a swatter can get it done. It’s incredibly expensive, laborious and dangers to remove LEO satellites. If something malfunctions then it’s essentially a stuck there until shot or nudged down.

      • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s disingenuous though. You have to compute the orbital tube volume to account for the collision risks.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah that’s true, calculating the actual collision risk is a whole different thing.

          It was really just a joke, cause you know space is bigger and more empty than most people realize. Because what I said was “technically” true, if not super meaningful in any way.

          That said, orbit isn’t too crowded yet, more is definitely going up, a lot more. Truth be told, 50 years from now, the number of satellites orbiting earth could easily be in the hundreds of thousands.

          • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            We’re at what, close to 20k right now?

            Won’t take 50 years.

            And not every orbit is equally useful. Near misses are getting more frequent, and it only takes 1 to start a chain reaction.