cm0002@europe.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoIt's just a questioneurope.pubimagemessage-square127linkfedilinkarrow-up1978arrow-down115
arrow-up1963arrow-down1imageIt's just a questioneurope.pubcm0002@europe.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square127linkfedilink
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoThat’s technically still within the “at least two” range 😉
minus-squareTheRealKuni@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoThe best kind of correct.
minus-squareFedizen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThe best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right. ‘Technically correct’ is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agono, the best kind of correct is when you find four stamps.
That’s technically still within the “at least two” range 😉
The best kind of correct.
The best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right.
‘Technically correct’ is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.
no, the best kind of correct is when you find four stamps.
Hermes Correct, lol