fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 days agoHD 137010 bmander.xyzimagemessage-square195linkfedilinkarrow-up1949arrow-down120
arrow-up1929arrow-down1imageHD 137010 bmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square195linkfedilink
minus-squareVenat0r@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 days agoAnd you’ll only need about 320 million GWh per ~80kg person… plus 4 million GWh per kg of supplies, equipment and ship weight…
minus-squarebufalo1973@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 days agoSo 340 PWh per person. A couple of guys with a static bike and a dynamo and that’s it😜 Note: the Earth receives 170 PWh of energy from the Sun in a year.
minus-squareVenat0r@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoSounds feasible for a fusion reactor to provide at some point in the very distant future.
minus-squarebufalo1973@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoTwice the full energy the Sun gives the Earth in a year for each person is not a future fusion reactor level. 😀
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoOh and also thats just the pure energy for acceleration/deceleration, not life support, steering, thrust ineffeciencies, take off, landing etc… 😅
And you’ll only need about 320 million GWh per ~80kg person… plus 4 million GWh per kg of supplies, equipment and ship weight…
So 340 PWh per person. A couple of guys with a static bike and a dynamo and that’s it😜
Note: the Earth receives 170 PWh of energy from the Sun in a year.
Sounds feasible for a fusion reactor to provide at some point in the very distant future.
Twice the full energy the Sun gives the Earth in a year for each person is not a future fusion reactor level. 😀
Great Scott!
Oh and also thats just the pure energy for acceleration/deceleration, not life support, steering, thrust ineffeciencies, take off, landing etc… 😅