Numerous posts sharing an address purportedly belonging to Langley have circulated on X, with many users responding to a viral post that quoted Langley as saying Americans must “compromise” on their privacy.
Some shared what they said was a blurred image of Langley’s home on Google Street View, with one X user saying the “compromise apparently doesn’t apply to him.”
Newsweek has not verified the address and is not publishing or linking to it.
The oppressor class has solidarity.
It’s evil to write an article about it and not post the address.
i dunno. it lets us know it’s out there and probably real this time, so get your… i forget what this dude did but he’s working with krasnov somehow so let’s just mail him those tiny millstone necklaces
Rampant censorship. Even posting it here makes things harder for the admins.
What’s the problem? I thought privacy was a small price to pay for “safety?”
Sounds like that Kirk guy on guns.
I looked up the address for the company that makes those shock gloves for ICE and it’s a big ass house an hour away from me. Of course it has a huge security gate.
Put up a row of cameras across from his house and see how he likes it.
Remember when Princess Diana died trying to escape paparazzi?
I’m not sure why I just thought of that. Hmm. Random.
She wasn’t a insufferablec u n t
also paparazzi harass people beyond just taking photos. when you hear a story of one behaving civilly you are surprised.
“targeted” is very loaded language. i just see a call for someone to live by their words or fold.
If he’s done nothing wrong he has nothing to hide, right?
This is TERRIBLE! RICH People shouldn’t have to Compromise on Privacy! That’s ONLY for Poors!
You don’t understand! They have to protect their children and their lives because they can be targeted!
Poor people aren’t real humans so it’s okay. When they get targeted it’s probably because they deserve it! /s
I saw in the rich neighborhoods in the town where I live the landscapers use their trailers to block the Flock cameras for their rich clients.
Must be weird to view people as a shield.
FWIW, I appreciate your discovery of this systemic issue IRL, and even moreso for sharing it here, for others.
All in all, the number of “elites” who wouldn’t use any of us as a human shield/prop/tool/beast of burden is nonzero, but it might as well be.
Thus making it the perfect target for crime!
Oh no, he got surveilled?
They even play coy and call us sheep with names like this.
I’m so sick of them and their constant greed. They are ALWAYS taking and ALWAYS STEALING.
THEY NEED TO GO AWAY NOW
Well, if he hates privacy then no problem here.
So. What’s his address?
