It’s not that hard to find viewing/listening numbers and site visitors.
You can frame it in a lot of ways, to balloon the number. Daily, weekly and monthly users would be interesting numbers to have.
The above numbers might indicate 94% interacts with BBC at least once a year, we can’t know. As the quote isn’t specifying how they determined it
The license fee is what the UK user currently pays, if you remove the license fee it won’t remain available to the UK audience for free
because the AI industry is “building AI-agent integrations into production infrastructure faster than it’s building the safety architecture to make those integrations safe”.
How dense are some people? No they don’t build integrations to your prod environment, you hand them the access willynilly. I was in an AI related greenfield project 2 years ago, there’s several reasons why communication with our db happened through an API. The primary one, control.
But he’s the establishment candidate! Just ask Farage!
Veritasium themselves has a video on the topic, they’ve indeed sold parts to investors
10 years post claim entering a getting there phase is good.
For plasma fusion it took like 40 years post promise to the getting there phase, as long as the getting there phase means private investors are willing to fund
Citizens of USA are Americans, but likewise are citizens of Mexico, Honduras and Paraguay
They’re probably just annotating within a common topic and in a language which is easy to find cheap workers within.
If you’re easily replaceable, they’ll use people from the third world for the job
Food isn’t everything, we’re overusing resources in other spaces too; People don’t really want to slow down on electrical consumption, travel or general waste/plastics
Rocket launch, Twitter and xAI is roughly a zero valuation.
Starlink the worlds fastest growing ISP, while having an enormous profit margin is the bread and butter. From a serious perspective, also what you should aim the valuation for.
Did their IPO launch at a fair valuation? Hell nah