

You’d make that bet, but I wouldn’t. And only one of us is guaranteed to have money walking out of the casino
College Prof in the US, focus areas are Human-Computer Interaction, Cybersecurity, and Machine Learning


You’d make that bet, but I wouldn’t. And only one of us is guaranteed to have money walking out of the casino


Monopoly is definitely the word, but they also don’t appear to be overly abusive about their market position.


I consider myself to be more pro AI than not, but I’m certainly not a zealot and mostly agree with the take that it shouldn’t be used in artistic pursuits. However, I love using AI to help me create art. It can give great critiques, often good advice on how to improve, and is great for rapid experimentation and prototyping. I actually used it this weekend to see what a D&D mini might look like with different color schemes before painting it. I could have done the same with Gimp, but it would have taken much longer for worse results that was ultimately just for a brain storming session. How do you feel about my AI usage from your perspective? I suppose from an energy conservation perspective, all of it was bad, but I’m more interested in a less trivial take.
The fact that it launched and didn’t have a shopping cart for 3 years is all it takes to know that it was never intended to be a serious competitor. A simple shopping cart is trivial to implement with modern programming tools, and even if it wasn’t, it should be part of the minimum viable product for any digital store front.