You’re back peddling now acting like you already knew that. You wouldn’t have said it was a generic phrase if you knew that.

It’s not generic at all. It’s literally the phrase used to describe the Top Secret classification. It’s very precise wording.

Must have been typing at the same time. I looked to see if anyone said the same thing. I got distracted in the middle of writing my comment as well. But, yes that wording is very specific.

Data about data isn’t necessarily at the same classification as the document.

Being locked in a safe only means Secret or above. However, the use of the phrase “grave damage to national security” indicates Top Secret. That’s the sort of thing that’s usually only accessed in a SCIF.

I just liked linux better so I learned it. That’s kind of my whole career, I want to do something so I get certified in it and start looking to get into it. I’m in consulting. I come in and help people setup OpenShift while teaching them how to use it and then move on to the next customer.

I probably also started with linux seriously around that time frame. I was also a Windows admin back then. Transitioning to Linux and containers was the best thing ever. You get out of dependency hell and having kruft all over your filesystem. I’m extremely biased though, I work for Red Hat now. Containers and Linux are my day job.

And honestly, 40 isn’t even impressive. I run more than that on one host. Containers make life so much easier is unreal.

That’s me too.

Does it matter if that cell service isn’t connected to a name?

I believe there are Bluetooth network protocols that mesh that would work for messaging and not require cell service. It would be smart to organize using something like that and just use any cell phone without cell service turned on. That still gives you the ability to call 911 in case of emergencies as well.

I think this is coming down to a difference in how we would define rigging. I’ve already said how it was rigged. You’re either going to continue to ignore it, or you just don’t think that’s rigging. Obviously you’re never going to be convinced even with the evidence right in front of you. Enjoy living your life like that.

The difference is, nobody has ever claimed I’m a genius because there isn’t evidence for it. Meanwhile there is evidence of the rigging.

There was no rigging as long as you ignore the rigging that I already discussed. Just because you say these things doesn’t make them true.

Lol, okay so you do understand that the process was rigged and resulted in bad candidates that lost. I accept your apology.

Nope. Are you seriously thinking that while Pete was Biden’s debate sparring partner he didn’t realize the Biden’s debate performance was going to be abysmal?

You’re ignoring how the DNC used super delegates to sway the primary votes in 16. They also provided Clinton with the debate questions ahead of time. They did everything in their power to tip the scales toward Clinton. In 2020 they changed the primary order to favor Biden, discouraged people from running against him, and even considered cutting the primaries early. Again they did everything in their power to pick Biden. Then when Biden dropped, they had time to at least hold a vote at the convention, but instead they appointed Harris. Btw, I did vote in those primaries, I donated to the Sanders campaign too.

He had the chance to sound the alarm about Biden’s mental health early on and didn’t take it. He’s part of the reason Trump is currently president.

Well, no. Both women were picked by the DNC and not by the voters.

I don’t think that’s the correct take. Both times it was maintain status quo vs a disruptor. The status quo has been terrible for the majority of Americans so they were willing to take the risk on the disruptor. That’s the same reason people split ticket voted for both Trump and AOC, they’re both disruptors.