Redjard

I interpret this as the “boundary” being one-way away from us, with us at the “top of the potential well”. As opposed to the more commonly proposed idea that the universe is inside a black hole.

Hawking radiation is based on the curvature of the event horizon, so in this case I think it should balance negatively, sucking out energy from the universe, probably by releasing negative energy particles in the particle perspective.

This doesn’t make physical sense, which matches that such an event horizon shape also doesn’t make sense and shouldn’t be able to be created I think.

I see. That does seem far fetched though, and really only holds any plausability once your ID doesn’t match your own claim.

It’s also completely fine under all international law.
Following copyright law is more like a trade agreement, so if you feel wronged enough as a nation it’s completely uncontroversial to suspend all or all international copyright law and deal with the consequences (mainly the us being very salty about it).

The EU contingency for a US attack on Greenland for example is among other steps to suspend all US copyrights recognition and starve the US service industry.

Yeah but then if they pass your id and agree to the bribery they’ll give you the 100$? It’s the wrong way around to be bribery.

Bribery needs pass and pay, this is pass or pay. The incentive for the storekeeper is to not sell to you and get the money.

I was already in the middle of posting this to !dontyouknowwhoiam@lemmy.world before seeing the remainder of your post :)

How is it related to bribery?

Most lenses only care about the angular light distribution, essentially averaging over the lens surface. So a ding or crack would just add a tiny portion of grey or black to the entire image

Edit: This is for cracking the front protective glass of a camera lens. If an actual optical lens splits in two it will be misaligned and bad things will happen.