alaphic

plus more.

Like… what? You can’t just say that like that and then not at least characterize the ‘more’ in some fashion…

Maybe the internet truly is… No Country for Old Men…

… The Aristocrats!

(If anyone gets this reference I’ll be what scientists are calling “fucking surprised”)

And only… checks calendar what, like 5 - 7 years after they were a thing? Great work guys, way to stay ahead of things

Also i dislike the implications and at what directions fun is beeing made.

… I’m sorry, but what in the actual incoherence is that even supposed to mean?

¿Por que no los dos?

If so, that only makes your comment all the more puzzling, honestly

Are you familiar with the term ‘tongue in cheek’? Or ‘hyperbole’? Cuz - I’m just sayin- I really doubt that even the yellow-est of rags would expect people to believe that we’re only a “bite my shiny metal ass” away from triggering a T2 style ‘Judgement Day’… I’d say it’s simply far more likely they were simply being facetious.

Now if it was NewsMax, on the other hand…

Wait, I’m sorry, what part of either of these is awesome? I’m lost… If A is the case, whether she had sex with someone else or not is immaterial to the discussion. If she thinks OP is someone else, for all intents and purposes, he is, at least as far as our discussion goes, which makes her a cheater. If B is the case and OP indeed is okay with being cucked (whether it’s by himself or not) I would argue that without both parties involved in the relationship having previously agreed to such an arrangement it is, once again, still infidelity and ergo decidedly not awesome.

Although, C) Ultimately none of this matters because D) OP wouldn’t remember either way, regardless and E) none of this happened to begin with anyway, so… Shenanigans.

“Please leave.”

• The Other Person In Wyoming