Having to make a decision isn’t my primary issue here (even though it can also be problematic, when you need to serialize domain-specific data for which you’re no expert). My issue is rather in that you have to write this decision down, so that it can be used for deserializing again. This just makes XML serialization code significantly more complex than JSON serialization code. Both in terms of the code becoming harder to understand, but also just lines of code needed.

This is, without a doubt, the stupidest argument against XML I’ve ever heard. Nobody has trouble with using attributes vs. tag bodies. Nobody. There are much more credible complaints to be made about parsing performance, memory overhead, extra size, complexity when using things like namespaces, etc.

I’ve somewhat come to expect less than a handful lines of code for serializing an object from memory into a file. If you do that with XML, it will just slap everything into child nodes, which may be fine, but might also not be.

No - it is fine to just use tag bodies. You don’t need to ever use attributes if you don’t want to. You’ve never actually used XML have you?

https://www.baeldung.com/jackson-xml-serialization-and-deserialization

I mean, yeah. But people don’t just do things randomly. Most people put data in the body and metadata in attributes just like html.

They’re siblings. They both derive from SGML. There is a version of HTML that is also XML conformant called XHTML but it never caught on…

JSON is super easy to read and write though. Just needs a parser that allows comments…

Fuck yaml. TOML or literally anything else.

This is your confusion, not an issue with XML.

Attributes tend to be “metadata”. You ever write HTML? It’s not confusing.

The last thing I want to see when I clock out is another terminal screen.

I’m reacting to this mostly. Self-hosters are a bit of an obnoxious blend of people who want turnkey-but-not-Google solutions and people willing to learn how to do things. People whining about “having to use a terminal” are generally in the former category.

Then don’t self host?

…it answers from the attached KBs only. If the fact isn’t there, it tells you - explicitly - instead of winging it.

So you’ve made a FAQ with a LLM interface? I could see that potentially being useful for cooperate “let our bot answer your questions” tools.

But the usefulness of AI isn’t just in “tell me a fact”. Like what would your AI give for "what functions would I use in Python to convert a utf16 string to utf8? Would the answer need to be in the KB already?

You want purity tests for people sharing a things they did? 🙄

Maybe whether they asked any forums for help? Do you want to know who they voted for as well?

Wisp turns indentation based syntax into Lisp.

Holy fuck no! 🤣

Well, many Schemers love the language

Neat. Everyone else hates it. Not dislikes, not “can deal with it”. But hates it.)))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))

“Stop trying to make ‘scheme’ happen”

Seriously though - almost nobody but language nerds like scheme.

Will we need to log in every morning and expect to refresh every damn site cert we connect to soon?

Automate your certificate renewals. You should be automating updates for security anyway.

Containers run on “bare metal” in exactly the same way other processes on your system do. You can even see them in your process list FFS. They’re just running in different cgroup’s that limit access to resources.

Yes, I’ll die on this hill.