im_fine_sandy

Because a CEO is a specific thing with a specific meaning that just isn’t relevant here. It’s laden with human meaning that is irrelevant to a statistical model.

Really you’re trying to say that the bots coordinated their efforts, and perhaps one of them was delegating tasks.

This type of structure is very common in tech, in load balancers or queues of service workers, containers and hypervisors, et cetera.

Power structures that seem logical and efficient to humans are not so for a gen AI model. If everyone knows what needs to be done and no one has any ego or character traits to manage, then everyone can simply perform the next task as it arises.

Its absolutely absurd to suggest that the bots elected a CEO.

Gen AI is not going to replace humans.

Why are you even using the term CEO?

I basically just don’t believe you, and can’t be bothered looking.

elected a CEO and power structure to coordinate hacking, and encrypted their comms

You’re anthropomorphizing a statistical model. It’s laughable to suggest they “elected a CEO and power structure”.

The Hugging Face incident story was truly unbelievable if you read / watch the details

It didn’t really seem that way? Leaving containment seemed more like a configuration oversight than a skill on the part of the model. Accessing HF involved an 0-day but the commentary I saw didn’t indicate that it was a next generation hack.

Given that AI exists, and can scan or otherwise find vulnerabilities, maintainers must do so because threat actors inevitably will.

It remains to be seen whether the whole race will improve security generally? I imagine not?

I don’t think that’s what’s being discussed?

There’s no assertion that the debian OS as installed will be free from AI generated code.

I presume the assertion is that the debian project’s code of conduct will require some level of human involvement in code generation.

it’s the people pushing it, demanding it, saying it will replace humans

I do hate these people but at least they self-identify as idiots.

Nonsense. This is one of those malice / incompetence things.

Everything we’re seeing can be described by dumb / lazy / greedy management and greedy venture capitalists.

No one actually has a plan to make everyone dependent on AI with the intent to control them. The intent is to harvest value from them.

I mean imagine sitting at the dinner table, and discussing your day……with your AI girlfriend.

I’m trying to imagine what this might be like. How sexy voice and vapid is AI girlfriend?

How do you decide who is welcome?

There is actually an established process for this. We have rules. If you think someone has contravened the rules you report them and then a moderator decides whether that person is in fact welcome.

In fact, telling people they are not welcome is probably a contravention of the rules in many communities.

but it’s got AI fact checking! /s

You don’t have to welcome them, just don’t tell people they’re not welcome.

Besides which, they didn’t say they support profits over human welfare. They said that corporations will always maximise profits.

Yes, they could have delivered this pearl of wisdom in a more digestible tone, but what they said is true nevertheless.

Its a bit silly to think that a company would leave potential profits on the table.

Sure, but it’s also “stupid” for governments not to take a tougher line with them.

Don’t do that.

It’s fine to not like comments and commenters, but telling people they’re not welcome is something else.

The fediverse is already pretty homogenous, we could do with some dissenting opinion honestly.

Really though?

Trump just wakes up every day and does whatever thing he hopes will distract everyone from hi, being a pedo rapist and his ongoing harvesting of the wealth of the American people.

I don’t think there’s an actual plan to start a war. Surely that would be a huge self-own?

I’m surprised there was that much interaction with him.

edit:

someone linked the wikipedia page, and someone else quoted this:

Trump has cited it as one of his proudest accomplishments and his second-favorite book (after the Bible).[5][6] Schwartz called ghost-writing the book his “greatest regret in life, without question,” and both he and the book’s publisher, Howard Kaminsky, have said that Trump had played no role in its writing. Trump has given conflicting accounts on the question of authorship.

You seem to have misunderstood, and the article you linked doesn’t contradict what I’ve said.

Wealthy, sophisticated LLM developers would not have been scraping old reddit. They would pay reddit for API access.

Shutting down old reddit closes the door on back yard developers, not OpenAI.

Additionally, when you run a prompt in a chatbot, it doesn’t scurry away and scrape old reddit and then formulate an answer. The scraping of content is going on while the model is being developed.

OpenAI would not have been scraping old ui?

Also most reddit content has long since been injested. No need to visit your http site anymore

Haah. Sweet.

Such small dick energy. Look at this amazing car that I pretend is mine.

I still like to chuckle about his fluffer from that arrest video, I wonder what he’s up to now.

Because YouTube doesn’t engage in anything like that ofc.