Some jobs are “buffer hires” (look it up) some jobs are “beeing the scapegoat for the real culprit at a higher position”, either one wouldnt be really discussed in a regular interview.

when they dont want to discuss important basic things in the interview just pick your favorite one and ask if its such a position, but if you do, plz report how it went.

the point is that people who don’t care go to lawyers to tell them how to move forward with appropriate caution. and privacy with a lawyers actual communication should be included. remember how lawyers (in movies tbh) often say ‘let me talk, dont say anything at all’, thats “maybe” because saying anything could reveal something the other party could use to win. if that doesnt include emails to be private, then why not directly use facebook or 4chan instead to tell the ither party how to win against your client? *lol

so if your lawyer doesnt take specific caution into account by himself what he would be supposed to tell you to do anyway, that lawyer is imo at best a risky bet.

if your lawyer uses google, microsoft or apple for email, maybe better look for another lawyer…

everything one of these (or other) giants know can be assumend to be compromised already in one way or possibly many others or at least in near future.

imagine you email your client some note, that he should carry some documents next time and the giant running word probability algorythms only to look later at the real outcome of the trial and the tactics used by you in front of court to be able to warn THEIR customers about what YOU might currently try to do in front of a court to win against someone. it intentionally removes parts of the value of your work to sell that to their customers while using data that is supposed to be private for reasons.

a lawyer who gives away hints about any of his actions to a tech giant NOW has a high probability that his work isnt worth a dime any longer in mid-term future only because of how lazy he was with his and his clients privacy TODAY.

just to mention.

bottom 10% in morale ARE the richest 10% which includes top 1% obviously.

see, a person who doesnt have enough to survive is only trying to survice and probably even beeing forces to do crimes by some gov that holds the key position AND the duty to help him not to need that.

a person who has enough money to never need to work in entire life but commits crimes anyway is the only savage one in that game.

those bottom 10% in morale who oppress all mankind ARE the top 10% financially.