That’s -10F for morally and intellectually superior people.

Ok I’ll say it one last time. You are an authoritarian right wing freedom hating lunatic. I am a normal rational decent person. Good luck with being an ardent opponent of liberty and democracy.

Why do you keep replying to me? Let’s be clear. I told you that I was banned for saying it’s wrong to ban people for saying Israel should exist. You then called me a Zionist even though I have been opposing Israel since the 90s. What’s wrong with you dude?

Play acting anarchists and mommy’s little skinheads.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Hubs

Sounds good, worthless authoritarian right wing dumbfuck.

If I’m a Zionist apologist, you are a traitor who deserves to be tortured and publicly executed.

Lmfao I’m not reading your right wing lunacy. Fuck off, right wing nutjob fascist dumbfuck.

Let’s talk about this. First of all, they banned me for simply disagreeing with the idea of the policy. That’s egregious and quite fascistic itself; I never even said how I felt about Zionism, but that’s kind of my original point.

Ok so taking each in turn. This is an online mini forum, not a physical bar. There is no threat of a fake anarchist space turning into a pro genocide mini forum because they already have the power to completely regulate everyone’s speech and behavior. But the main point is that this is just a bad analogy. There is no similarity between the online forum and dealing with physically violent and threatening people. It’s a ridiculous comparison.

Turning to the paradox of tolerance, that’s not a real thing. It’s not paradoxical to refuse to tolerate intolerance. This has nothing to do with the deep hatred of freedom that is banning “zionists and Zionist apologists”. You’re already moderating people’s behavior. If someone is spamming garbage or being a nuisance, that’s different than someone saying “I think Israel has a right to exist” or something similar.

Banning people who simply advocate for the existence of the Israeli state is authoritarian lunacy. It’s the right of the fascists who run this instance, no question, but it is objectively fascist right wing behavior. No decent person would even consider it.

“Anarchist” is how I would put it. They banned me for saying it’s fascist to literally ban people for “being zionists”, whatever that’s supposed to mean. Maybe play acting anarchists.

Don’t tell this to the fascists over at dbzero, oh wait…

We have this in the US but the states have a significant amount of sovereignty in law making. Most laws are local. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just saying I don’t think it has to go down that route.

Why would you think that the European Union would be become like the USSR? It appears to be a frustrating bureaucracy at times, but I never got the impression that member states had to give up any significant amount of sovereignty.