• sbbq@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If consumers can’t get new gpus, devs aren’t going to bother spec’ing for them. This’ll probably just result in a stalling of tech you’ll see at home for a few years. Honestly that seems to be happening already. The leaps we’d seen in previous generations seem to be slowing anyway. Maybe this is just a plateau of tech for a while. Good for consumers when they accept that they don’t have to always be on the bleeding edge.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    So that kind of means that the high-end AAA PC market will crash in the next years, right? No new GPUs, production stop for existing GPUs and rising prices for GPU & RAM in combination with inflation and a bad economy ensure that many people can’t afford a gaming computer. And that a lot of those younger gamers can’t afford to start this hobby.

    And that means a shrinking audience for games, which need all this GPU power. If you’re an AAA publisher, it kind of looks crazy to invest multiple millions into a game that you can’t be sure that your audience will be able to afford to play

    • xektop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes, but think about the money in mobile and console gaming… PC gaming was niche even before that and we represent very small percentage of the overall gaming industry. Nobody gives a fuck about us since some time already. Now they just show it to us in daylight.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Don’t worry, you can Stream It From the CLOUD™️ for the low low price of 6x what a GPU would cost you over 5 years.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Definitely a shrinking audience for AAA games, but I don’t think it will be too bad gamers overall. Consoles will keep marching forward, as will Valve with the Steam Deck and Steam Machine.

      I think the highest of the high end graphics stuff has long since hit diminishing returns. You can do a hell of a lot with yesterday’s hardware and less-than-bleeding-edge process nodes for newer hardware. Consoles have never used bleeding edge GPUs and they’ve always done fine with sales (across the whole market, if not always individually). I think we’re highly unlikely to see a repeat of the 1983 gaming crash.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Someone is going to make bank by catering to consumers. Will the market accept nvidia back with open arms if/when the ai investments fall through?

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As a Linux gamer, nvidia was already on thin ice.

      Also I had past them up on recentish purchases since they only really controlled the highest end of the market which I don’t have the budget for. So honestly I have no intention of welcoming them back unless there is literally no other option. You made your bed.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That would be nice. But video cards are a VERY niche piece of engineering. The knowledge of HOW to make them is locked in a handful of people, and the ability to make them locked behind a very niche set of equipment that will ALSO be exploding in cost.

      One does not simply start a graphics card company.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t think a newcomer could do it, but a company like Intel is posed to be in a good position. They don’t have much market share but they have a good product.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The problem with that is Intel is subject to the same bullshit economic assessments as AMD and Nvidia… They’ll just as soon retool for ai as well.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Intel is arguably worse. They‘re in a bad spot right now so they can‘t do crazy things like Nvidia but they totally would and will go down the same path. I don‘t think US designed hardware will ever truly come back to end consumer products.

          • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nothing will. They’re moving us onto techno feudalism. We won’t earn anything and we’ll be wage slaves if they’re merciful to us, otherwise most people will be in camps and dead, unless we stand up real damn soon .

            They’re actively moving away from the bottom 90% of consumers, it’s just not worth it anymore and maybe once it was worth advertising to us, but no longer. The top 10% owns 93% of stocks and control at least 55% of the market revenue as of early 2025, probably closer to 60-65% now, after tariffs, layoffs, and the nonexistent recession We’re all imagining and definitely isn’t real. /s

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Intel is partly owned by the US government now. You think they want tech going to the people when they themselves want them for skynet.