• unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        The colonizers are not seeking to save Palestine from Islamic fundamentalism, but Hamas is fighting the colonizers to save Palestine.

        The ideology is less relevant than the facts of life and death. Consider rereading the comment you posted for further clarity. “Morality means nothing to the dead.”

        • statelesz@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          The ideology is relevant because it determines what happens if Hamas “saved Palestine”. They will constitute an Islamic state just like Iran and oppress it’s people.

          • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            If Palestine is freed from the colonizers, then it will have boundless options for its own governance.

            No conclusion is foregone respecting such affairs.

            If the colonizers are not resisted, then Palestinians simply will be dead.

            It should seem clear that you are following the worse path.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      That’s very campist. Doesn’t that mean anarchists would’ve supported the Irgun and Lehi? Jewish terrorists who attacked arab colonisers or settlers and later went on to create the Likud party?

      Because those groups, much like Hamas, say that they’re a resistance against colonisation.

      • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I defined campism in another comment. Your understanding of the term is inaccurate.

        Again, you are falling victim to all-or-nothing thinking. It is not honest or reasonable.