mudkip@lemdro.id to Crappy Design@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down128cross-posted to: mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
arrow-up128arrow-down1imageSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Crappy Design@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square26linkfedilinkcross-posted to: mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoYou think a person with 90–100 IQ knows this shit? 🙃
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoAnd a person with low IQ probably wouldn’t study much statistics. Probably.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoIn a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don’t think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution.
You think a person with 90–100 IQ knows this shit? 🙃
I’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
And a person with low IQ probably wouldn’t study much statistics. Probably.
90-100 isnt low
In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don’t think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution.