• itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    But in fact USA and Israel are the countries that spy on anyone. I am more concern about USA and Israel spying than from India and China. In this point in history USA and Israel are the enemy of the world.

    • shane@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      All countries spy on each other.

      I definitely agree about being more worried about the US spying than China though.

      • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only reasonable stance in 2026 is any government entity is just as much of a threat to an individual’s well-being and livelihood as a criminal organization.

        No one should be spying on you. Not the CCP. Not the US NSA/CIA, not Mossad, not anyone.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2026/PSA260312

      Compromised devices already comprise what amounts to a foothold within US network infrastructure that makes attribution of actors and defense of critical infrastructure impossible.

      It’s actually a really good situation for China since they have access to millions of these compromised devices in police stations, fire stations, hospitals, within critical infrastructure networks etc.

      Also, the equivalent of mail censorship is already being done by more subtle means.

      The US is more fucked than you know. I just hope the US doesn’t piss china off too much. The asymmetric warfare will claim more lives of civilians than combatants.

      • FrankFrankson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well tell us your four point plan about how to overthrow the US government and take back control. You can base it on one of the numerous revolutions you have obviously been a part of. It’s not like you are just some asshole who doesn’t really know anything about it and you are just greatly oversimplifying the situation…that couldn’t be it.

          • FrankFrankson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Go to Truesizeof.net and look at how fucking big America is. It’s roughly as big as all the countries involved with the Arab Spring events added together but it would basically have to be overthrown all at once. We can’t overthrow Virginia then slowly work our way around to other states.

            People outside America act like we are doing nothing but there are protests, riots, and people are getting disappeared by ICE every day. There is no magical way to get a few million people to roll over the White House becuase the president has his own very violent army (ICE) and much of the military supports him becuase they fired all the generals who didn’t.

            We are not spoiled fat lazy childten. Most of us work at least two jobs and still live paycheck to paycheck. Roughly 60% of the population is one paycheck away from homelessness.

            …but yeah all Americans are lazy fat fucks for not fixing a situation you have never been in or offer any real solutions for.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Look at France because all because they wanted to raise the retirement age. Maybe we should start making jokes about Americans being docile. Like they make fun of the French being cowards. And all Americans do is protest once every couple of months. And say we good.

  • Paranoid Factoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can understand the FTC being involved because trade. But the FCC? Maybe regulatory authority over WiFi? But this seems like massive over reach.

    Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

      I only remember when conservatives lied everytime they opened their mouths.

      • shane@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, Reagan was always talking about small government, and then he blew up the deficit with unchecked spending. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      How about the bit where they say home routers have to be approved by the DHS or the “Department of War”? This is not normal.

    • halowpeano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean… “Small government” Republicans were always demonstrably lying, as far back as any of them have been alive. Every one of them just wanted to shift money from things that support people to the pockets of their donors.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      They still do claim that, but every federal republican administration since I have been born has spent more than it brought in, and has a less fiscally conservative record than every administration from the other major party, whom they tarred as fiscally irresponsible the entire time. I am almost 50.

  • Pulsar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 days ago

    The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:

    1. get bribes or favors from telecom equipment manufacturers.
    2. Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.
    3. Force users to use ISP provided equipment.
  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This only applies to routers.

    It’s not widely known outside the ham radio community, but part of the 2.4GHz wifi band overlaps the 13cm amateur radio band. If you turn off 5GHz wifi and lock the 2.4GHz AP to Channel 1, it qualifies as a ham radio, and can be sold as a ham radio instead of an AP/Router. You do need a ham radio license to operate it as a Ham AP, but you do not need a license to buy a Ham AP.

    If the end user wants to turn on 5GHz after the fact, there is not a damn thing the FCC can do about it.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That deals with the need for a WiFi access point, but not the main router functionality. Another approach would be a low-power PC running OPNsense or PFsense with a WiFi card repurposed as an access point. Or, if the new policy concerns only routers and not access points, a PC for the router plus a dedicated WiFi access point (some device that is not capable of being a router).

    • evil_andy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But you can’t run encryption on it. So that means no WEP, no WPA, no SSL, TLS, VPN, etc.

      So yes, while you could run your own wireless access point, it doesn’t solve the main requirement for most people which is privacy.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        You aren’t understanding my point.

        My point is that you can continue to import and sell the exact same physical device, just with a little change in marketing, and possibly software.

        My point is this: Once you have acquired the device, there is fuck all the FCC can do about you converting your “ham radio” back into a consumer-grade router.

        • kalpol@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is technically not true, the FCC can and does enforce spectrum usage rules. Whether they will expend resources chasing down your router or your unlicensed GMRS is another matter.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If foreign made routers pose a severe cybersecurity risk then why would you let the current ones on the market stay? If they were truly a problem you’d remove them from the market, not grandfather them.

    But like everything with this capricious administration the real reason they’re doing this is probably because someone greased their palms.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    4 days ago

    Awesome. So what used to be a $50 router is about to be a $150 router. Great.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      $150 will get you a mini PC that you can run OPNsense on. Hopefully they don’t ban WiFi access points next.

      • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        there is not much wifi access points that are not routers at the same time and i doubt that said regulation would make such a minor a distinction.

        also keep in mind that the news articles are specifically talking about tp-link products.

        unfortunately we can only guess, because only official document i have found is as vague as the news reports.

        https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist

        Routers^ produced in a foreign country, except routers which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          Access points and routers are usually separate once you get away from the consumer grade stuff. The people that run OPNsense at home often use MikroTik or Ubiquiti access points.

          • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            i don’t think there is single mikrotik that can’t function as a router. the fact you can configure them as software bridge does not change that.

            the rest answered here:

            there are some but they are definitely in the minority. also this regulation is focused on home and soho devices, it specifically mentiones tp-link, which is really not enterprise brand.

            also the regulation from what i found is so vague, that i suspect that for the author router equals to “that white box with antenna sitting on my table” and is very likely they have no clue about difference between l2 and l3 layer and what router actually is.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          There are. Just need to shop in the business side of the store and not consumer. At worst pro-sumer.

          • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            there are some but they are definitely in the minority. also this regulation is focused on home and soho devices, it specifically mentiones tp-link, which is really not enterprise brand.

            also the regulation from what i found is so vague, that i suspect that for the author router equals to “that white box with antenna sitting on my table” and is very likely they have no clue about difference between l2 and l3 layer and what router actually is.

            • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You’re being pretty stubborn about your positions but you’re misinformed/ignorant.

              There are SO many Wi-Fi access points that aren’t routers, but a combo router is what most home users buy or get from their ISP. So that’s what you think is “most” when in reality the consumer market is dwarfed by commercial.

              TP-Link has Omada which is not as enterprise as CISCO but it definitely supports small and medium sized businesses, which are at the greatest risk to vulnerabilities due to low IT department skills.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Even more isolationism. Knowing how the usa works, they discovered the equipment was set up for spying on their people and they want all of that “spying on their own people” power for themselves.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      they want all of that “spying on their own people” power for themselves.

      My assumption as well, after after the video release in the Guthrie case, we know objectively that every device with a microphone or camera and a wireless connection is spying on us and feeding the data to the US government without a warrant too.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well it does say consumer-grade. Not sure what the reasoning there is, as backdoors in enterprise equipment would be much worse for national security

      • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Producers of consumer-grade routers that receive Conditional Approval from DoW or DHS can continue to receive FCC equipment authorizations. Interested applicants are encouraged to submit applications to conditional-approvals@fcc.gov

        A very speculative, cynical interpretation: something of value will be exchanged for the privilege of conditional approval.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Enterprise grade equipment comes with entire teams dedicated to securing it, with various overlapping services intended to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities. Along with enterprise level agreements around usage and support.

        Consumer grade is just fire and forget, you’re on your own.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    4 days ago

    Conditional approvals - it’s a bribe scheme. Companies can ask for exceptions. Sure they wouldn’t Grease any palms…

      • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        So the application process is “drop us an email and we’ll tell you where to deposit the money.”