• Visstix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    “Rockwell Property initially proposed building a 34-storey tower with 142 flats, which was later reduced to 110 flats, including 54 affordable homes”

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      So he is right with it being non affordable housing as over half of them are not affordable housing.

    • strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      Come on man, luxury flats are not luxury and affordable homes are not affordable.

      These properties are nothing but assets for the rich to add to their portfolio and a few people that are lucky enough to have generational wealth or a couple with 100,000+ salaries.