Planning inspector backs council’s rejection of development, which was ‘not exemplary, extraordinary, remarkable or distinctive, just tall’
    • Visstix@lemmy.worldEnglish
      31·
      30 days ago

      “Rockwell Property initially proposed building a 34-storey tower with 142 flats, which was later reduced to 110 flats, including 54 affordable homes”

      • slazer2au@lemmy.worldEnglish
        31·
        30 days ago

        So he is right with it being non affordable housing as over half of them are not affordable housing.

      • strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        2·
        29 days ago

        Come on man, luxury flats are not luxury and affordable homes are not affordable.

        These properties are nothing but assets for the rich to add to their portfolio and a few people that are lucky enough to have generational wealth or a couple with 100,000+ salaries.